Ноутбук acer aspire e5-575g-35ra обзор
Информация на сайте, в т.ч.: описание, технические характеристики составлено ООО «Компьюлан». Использование данного материала, частично или целиком, на сторонних сайтах разрешено только при прямой ссылке на страницу сайта, с которой была взята информация.
Вся информация, опубликованная на сайте www.kns.ru, в т.ч. цены товаров, описания, характеристики и комплектации, извещения об оформлении, а так же обработке заказа не являются публичной офертой, определяемой положениями Статьи 437 Гражданского кодекса РФ и носят исключительно справочный характер. Договор заключается только после подтверждения исполнения заказа сотрудником КНС.
Нашли ошибку на сайте? Выделите ее на странице, нажмите Ctrl+Enter и отправьте нам. Будем Вам очень признательны!
Отзывы Ноутбук Acer Aspire E5-575G-35RA [NX.GDWER.057]
В целом отличный ноут. По железу зверь. Цену можно было бы и ниже опустить немного , ибо это не идеал.
Матрица , хоть и фул шд , но не сказал бы что она выше среднего, под разными углами вообще плохо видно , плюс ещё напрягает при открытии/закрытии крышки такое ощущение что сдомаешь крышку (но это только чувство).
Клавиатура жутко неудобная для меня, как то китайцы наперемещали всего абы как , конечно за неделю можно привыкнуть у новой клавиатуре, но все равно сразу было очень неудобно печатать и ещё кнопка вкл/выкл находится в самой клавиатуре, тоже как то не очень.
Звук так себе ,но почему то писали в других отзывах что тихий, но по громкости нормальный.
дисковод шумный, таких ещё ни разу не слышал, такое чувство что кто то дрелью сверлит железо внутри ноута, при прокрутке диска.
HDD можно было бы и получше , но впринципе сойдёт.
Сразу поставил 7ку винду ради экспериментов, работало щустро но драйверов пару не нашел, надоело искать и поставил 10ку. На десятку все легло гладко , но фак она тормозит. В итоге поставил linux и стало все просто шикарно.
Стоит отметить что среди этой ценовой категории по железу будет очень трудно отыскать что то похожее.
В целом ноут устраивает шустрый, а ещё на будущее можно доставить ссд и будет шик.
Acer Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M) Notebook Review
Not every gaming savvy customer is willing to spend several thousand Euros on a gaming-suitable, high-end laptop by manufacturers such as ASUS, MSI or Schenker. However, this is not really necessary: Many cheaper devices are quite capable of rendering up-to-date games smoothly – albeit with some concessions in resolution and details.
Acer promises just this with its new Aspire E5-575G. Not only has it incorporated a cutting-edge Core i5 processor from the Kaby Lake generation into the 15-inch device, but also a dedicated GeForce GTX 950M as well a fast GDDR5 memory, all for just 630 Euros (
$707). Although its other configuration features in the form of 8 GB of RAM, a traditional 1000 GB hard drive and Linux operating system (that we replaced with a Windows 10 64-bit version in the test) can be classified as mediocre, the Taiwanese manufacturer seems to have created a potential price-performance bargain here. The following test will clarify whether losses in quality have to be accepted elsewhere.
Consequently, we will compare the Aspire E5-575G with its F5-573G (GTX 950M, i5-6200U) sister model, Medion’s Erazer P6661 (GTX 950M, i7-6500U), and the somewhat more expensive Nexoc M512 III (GTX 950M, i7-6700HQ) powered by a quad-core among others.
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Multimedia — 09/23/2016 — v5.1
Differences to the Aspire F5-573G
Since the casing, connectivity and input devices (apart from the omitted keyboard backlight) of the E5-575G strongly resemble those of the F5-573G, we will not re-examine these components and use the screenshots from the previous test. However, it should be noted that the aluminum-reinforced display lid of the F series has been replaced by cheaper plastic in the E lineup, which consequently involves some losses in touch and stability. Overall, the build is nevertheless functional and robust. The speed of the SD card reader and the Wi-Fi module (1×1 802.11ac) are also in a good midfield.
Left: Kensington Lock, vents, USB Type-C, Gbit-Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0
Right: 3.5-mm combo jack, USB 2.0, DVD-RW drive, power-in
Front: SD card reader, status LEDs
Rear: No interfaces
SD Card Reader
Communication
Display
Subpixel grid
Notwithstanding the comparatively low purchase price, the E5-575G has a relatively high-resolution Full HD screen. Its 1920×1080 pixels combined with a diagonal of 15.6 inches lead to a decent pixel density of 141 PPI. Thus, the reproduction is pleasantly sharp and users with normal eyesight should be able to recognize all the contents well, even without increasing the scaling factor (which can often cause problems with older programs).
Unfortunately, the TN screen from the manufacturer Chi Mei at most does a mediocre job in all other rating criteria. The average maximum brightness of 169 cd/m² in particular is far too low — we expect at least 230 to 250 cd/m² or more even in this price range. At the same time, the screen cannot be dimmed enough and still shines at a bright 26 cd/m² even at minimum settings. The relatively homogeneous illumination and flicker-free backlight control without PWM only compensates for this to a small extent. The screen’s black level (0.47 cd/m²) that results in a very low contrast ratio (374:1) is not much better. The subjective image impression is correspondingly pale and lifeless.
* . smaller is better
AdobeRGB coverage (36.8%)
sRGB coverage (57.3%)
The screen does an equally bad job in terms of color and grayscale reproduction. High DeltaE rates of 8.8 (colors) and 9.0 (Grayscale) in conjunction with the much too small color space (57% sRGB covered) do not lead to really satisfactory results, even when editing private photos as a hobby. Although calibration eliminates the visible bluish tint, the color space related restrictions at high color saturation persist.
Grayscale (pre-calibration)
ColorChecker (pre-calibration)
Saturation Sweeps (pre-calibration)
Grayscale (post-calibration)
ColorChecker (post-calibration)
Saturation Sweeps (post-calibration)
Although the E5-575G has a matte and thus largely reflection-free screen, we cannot recommend the laptop for outdoor use with a clear conscious. The maximum possible brightness of just less than 170 cd/m² are simply too low for recognizing the contents without problems. The screen is virtually illegible on sunny days.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms . rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms . rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14780 (minimum: 5 — maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.
Viewing angles: Acer Aspire E5-575G
As typical for TN, users only see a true reproduction at an absolute perpendicular viewing angle. The slightest deviations upward or downward quickly lead to an extreme brightening or darkening of the image, distorted colors and significant loss in contrast. The lateral elbowroom is somewhat bigger, but the device can only conditionally be viewed by several users at the same time. An IPS panel, such as the one in Medion’s Erazer P6661, would have done a considerably better job here.
Performance
3.1 GHz maximum Turbo speed
Acer’s Aspire E5-575G is one of the first laptops based on the Kaby Lake architecture, the successor of the Skylake lineup introduced in 2015. Technically, not much has changed in the new generation. Thanks to the optimized 14 nm manufacturing, Intel can now offer somewhat higher clock rates at the same power consumption, while the per-MHz performance stagnates at a high level. This equates to a clock headroom of 2.5 to 3.1 GHz (2-core Turbo: also 3.1 GHz) in the case of the Core i5-7200U ULV model (TDP: 15 watts) installed here, which is 200 to 400 MHz higher than the previous Core i5-6200U (2.3 to 2.8 GHz, 2-core Turbo: 2.7 GHz). Most of the other technical specifications of the dual-core processor with Hyperthreading support have not been modified.
Although the HD Graphics 620 integrated into the Kaby Lake chip is somewhat stronger than the previous ones, Acer has opted for an additional dedicated graphic solution by Nvidia. The GeForce GTX 950M, which is still based on the Maxwell architecture built in 28 nanometers, promises three times the performance of the processor GPU and has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory. The GTX 950M is only enabled during 3D application via the Optimus technology for reducing the power consumption, as opposed to simple desktop applications that are accelerated via the HD 620.
Considering the purchase price, the user has to be satisfied with a conventional hard drive that, however, offers a very generous capacity of 1000 GB. Furthermore, thanks to the empty M.2 slot, an SSD can be retrofitted as a second storage device. The 8 GB of working memory (1×8 GB DDR4-2133, single-channel, one empty bank) could also use an upgrade in the long run.
Источник https://www.kns.ru/product/noutbuk-acer-aspire-e5-575g-35ra-nx-gdwer-057/characteristics/
Источник http://goodsopinion.ru/otzyvy-noutbuk-acer-aspire-e5-575g-35ra-nx-gdwer-057-1073888/
Источник https://www.notebookcheck.net/Acer-Aspire-E5-575G-i5-7200U-GTX-950M-Notebook-Review.178326.0.html
Источник